Estimated read time: 8 minutes
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 70,865 other subscribers
Mark Zohar, president and COO at Viafoura.com, joined me on a live recording of the Business Storytelling Podcast to discuss how his company addresses creating better online communities. In other words, Viafoura helps companies create active, civil and loyal online communities. Who wouldn’t want that!
When I first jumped into digital communications building online communities was in its infancy. The potential was great. We could easily communicate with people. We could have discussions worth having. Unfortunately, some of those online communities have been less than enjoyable. Some people are just rude.
We discussed Facebook Groups here. I’ve turned comments on this blog off years ago. And most B2B blogs follow the same thought process. Comments are off. Mitch Jackson shared that Clubhouse also helps with civility.
On the episode, which you can also watch here, Mark shared:
Before you start online communities, make sure you know:
Some other items that I would like to re-share in the context of online communities here are thoughts on:
Let’s dive into those areas now.
I used to have comments turned on and every once in a while somebody would leave a comment. People might say that they agreed or liked a post. Yes, some of those were spam, too. Some disagreed.
Very little real discussion happened in the comments section – even for the articles that had them.
My first major run-in with comments happened when I set up topical websites at an Eastern Iowa media company in 2010-11. We partnered with a local event where people where sharing five-minute Ignite talks with their visions for the community’s future.
The talks were great, inspiring and some may even a bit unrealistic. But then dreams aren’t necessarily supposed to be realistic for today.
Many videos were shared dozens of times – some over 100 times. (Many community managers would love those kind of shares!)
But there were hardly any comments on the site. All the commenting and discussion happened on social media – Facebook, for the most part. What made it worse for yours truly: How can you measure all of this apparently awesome discussion? Much of it was behind privacy walls. But the glimpse of what I could see was promising. But none of it on my site.
It’s OK. Conversation happens where it happens and it can’t be forced – for the most part.
Years later I’ve completely turned comments off on The Authentic Storytelling Project. Hardly anyone complains and when people have a question they email or – more commonly – tweet at me. Not a problem at all for the most part.
Once, though, somebody took an issue with my comments being closed. He said something about me not being open to feedback and when I asked what his feedback was he just kept telling me my comments are closed and should be open.
He did end up blogging about my comments being closed. His comments were open, by the way. After his post published, I noticed a lot of Twitter discussion surrounding the post.
I was receiving a lot of notifications since folks were tagging me. I looked quickly and couldn’t figure out what the flurry of Tweets was even talking about. I had to run and forgot about it. Thirty minutes or so later I returned to who a bunch of unread Tweets. People were still discussion the article – but not in the comments – on Twitter!
I jumped in, just to get one of my advocate to respond: “No need to explain. You know what you are doing.”
Point proven, I thought, discussion often happens on social media and not necessarily in the blog sections – though it can. There are sites that have great comment section discussions from time to time.
If I have anything of substance to say, though, I will probably likely draft my own post and share it here and link to the original article.
Oftentimes, comments are seen as an immediate success metric. If people comment, we have engagement. So we are shooting for that. We can see the engagement.
But comments aren’t always a measurement of engagement. Let me take EasternIowaNews.com. The news start-up had over 100,000 unique visitors in just nine months and hardly any comments.
It was widely considered a success and even helped me get a job. The site had 80-some contributors and 2,700 posts. It worked and people read it.
But comments are often taken as a success metric. If we turn them off, how will we measure success? First, I would always recommend to tie blogging to a business goal, but for early digital metrics you might also consider these (instead of comments):
This doesn’t mean that all sites should remove comments. There might be a very good reason why you should have comments turned on and it’s working on your site. But don’t think of it as a default and required setting. When in doubt, test it and then go from there.
Comments on this blog have been turned off for years but nonetheless, I appreciate getting emails and chatting with you all on social media. Except the spammers.
But here’s a fact – especially for organizations who evolving their strategy: Comments are easily the most over-thought piece of content.
It often looks like this:
Don’t get me wrong. There are some blogs – usually ones with massive traffic – that have comments and even get good ones. But it’s the least bit to focus on early-on in an content strategy implementation. Focus your energy here:
Respond to comments that ask relevant questions.
But then people also ask irrelevant questions or make spammy comments:
Sometimes, it can be hard to tell what’s spam and what’s not, but if the comment falls into one of those areas, it likely is.
Twitter has similar issues. People send auto-messages when you follow them. Those messages often ask questions that could be relevant. If you hadn’t seen it 1,299 times you might easily be fooled. They aren’t really trying to have a conversation with you. They just want you to respond and will then count that as an engagement. Yay, one more response I ignored.
I’ve actually responded by retweeting with an answer before when I thought my followers would actually care. But in general, it’s a waste of time to even acknowledge them.
Good rule of thumb: If they don’t even follow you, it’s likely automated.
Don’t have a committee meeting on how to respond. Don’t send it to your experts to spend any time on. Just ignore it. This is a general rule of thumb.
You’ll likely mistake a real comment for spam at some point. If they follow up, just respond then and move forward. Common sense applies.
In general, your return on investment will be higher if you focus on sharing relevant content first and distributing it well.
It certainly can be a fine line and it is a good practice to respond to customer issues on social media. But what’s the point in responding to spam?
Also keep in mind that some people are trying to trigger others to respond and share their content.
For example, we had a bad storm in Eastern Iowa in 2020. Lots of damage. Some unknown national media figure tweeted something that triggered a lot of people. Many responded and even shared the comment. That’s free advertising for that person. Something to keep in mind when you decide to respond.
The same can happen on blog comments. Some people just comment to drop a link to their website. So in those cases it’s not about the conversation but about their marketing!
Move your content from happening to performing. The 2020 textbook:
This content was originally published here.